8. About God, Part 2: God Is Neither Superman Nor Santa

By

This essay continues a sequence. Read the previous one here.

When I was a child,
I spake as a child,
I understood as a child,
I thought as a child:
but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

— KJV, 1 Corinthians 13:11

Most of our views of God are childish. They rest neither on Christ’s Word nor on basic logic. The only cure is living The Word – and that is hard.

Click here to receive new essays from The Word, (Re)Discovered every week

We refer to earlier discussions about the mindset required to understand The Word (ref. “We Don’t Understand The Word“), and the fact that we cannot fully understand God as He actually Is (ref. “Knowing of’ Is Not Knowing“). 

God does not have human traits1

Anthropomorphism is the attribution of human characteristics to an entity that is not human.

For example we might say that a pet dog “has a guilty look” after some bad behavior.

But dogs don’t experience guilt. That look is a manifestation of the fear the animal feels based on its previous experiences of the behavior of its owner in such situations.

Anthropomorphism is dangerous in the things of God.

In our discussion about levels of understanding (ref. “‘Knowing of’ Is Not Knowing“), we used the gap in nature between animal and man as a rough analogy of the gap between man and God.

We cannot arrive at an accurate concept of God by starting from a human characteristic and trying to “upgrade” it, as if the Creator is merely a super-human-being.

This would be like what animal psychologists tell us about the attitude of dogs towards their owners. To the dog, its owner is the leader of the dog pack: the alpha dog.

In other words, human beings are “super-dogs” as far as dogs are concerned. This is high praise from dogs, but it degrades humanity to the level of an animal.

We can’t blame the dog; that is the highest it can conceive. But we should avoid making similar mistakes in our attitude towards the Creator.

Click here to receive new essays from The Word, (Re)Discovered every week

The Creator does not have human traits. We have a spiritual image of some of the traits that are in Him.

No man knoweth the Son,
but the Father;
neither knoweth any man the Father,
save the Son,
and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him

— Matt 11:27

The Son reveals The Father through The Word (ref. “What Is The Word?“). Unlike human words, The Word of The Son is alive. Therefore, It is not understood merely by reading It (as could be done with human words) but by living It (ref. “Truth vs Human Words“).

The living of The Word results in spiritual experiences that develop the spiritual maturity to arrive at a humanly accurate conception of the Almighty.

Example: God’s Love (vs Santa’s Love)

We tend to envisage God’s Love as a highly “upgraded” version of human “love”. 

This manifestation of anthropomorphism is particularly dangerous because a proper understanding of Love is central to understanding The Word.

His Love deals with our eternal, spiritual welfare. But we approach Him with wishlists full of temporal and material demands, and we demand the granting of these as evidence of His Love.

A more appropriate attitude would be one of gratitude and trust:

[Y]our Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask him.

— Matt 6:8

With this attitude, we would put aside requests and focus on penetrating the revelation of Truth given in The Word, and adjusting all aspects of our lives accordingly:

Sanctify them through Thy Truth: Thy Word is Truth.
— John 17:17

Today’s Resolution

  • In all our thinking and praying, we shall not “humanize” God. 
  • We shall not forget that He is Highest Love and Highest Power, existing infinitely far above us, and that he reaches out graciously towards us through His Will only out of Love for us.

Click here to receive new essays from The Word, (Re)Discovered every week

  1. For the curious reader the book “Thinking About God” by Stephen Lampe provides interesting perspectives on some of the issues raised here. ↩︎

Next Essay…

Back to Homepage: The Word (Re)Discovered

16 responses to “8. About God, Part 2: God Is Neither Superman Nor Santa”

  1. […] These essays are written in sequence and build upon each other. Read the preceding essay here. […]

  2. […] Is Not A Name“).  It has no correlation or similarity with a human relationship (ref. “God Is Not Superman“).  The Nature of Christ is eternal and above human concepts.  Therefore this relationship […]

  3. […] must be a large amount of anthropomorphism (ref. “God Is Not Superman“) in our thinking if we believe that the Eternal and Unchangeable Creator is […]

  4. speedilymagnificent3a677f0b49 Avatar
    speedilymagnificent3a677f0b49

    God’s greatness is often described through boundless love and mercy. For example, in Christianity, God’s love is shown through forgiveness and grace, as seen in teachings like John 3:16. In Islam, “Allahu Akbar” (God is Great) is paired with attributes like Ar-Rahman (The Merciful), emphasizing compassion

  5. Fatima ibrahim Avatar

    aww 🥰 interested

  6. mayokun1964 Avatar

    Part of this message is Thought-Provoking Insight

    Part of the passage highlights a crucial aspect of spirituality: the distinction between seeking material benefits and truly understanding divine love. By focusing on temporal desires, we risk misunderstanding the nature of God’s love, which is rooted in eternal and spiritual welfare. A shift in attitude towards gratitude and trust can help us align our priorities and deepen our spiritual connection.

  7. mayokun1964 Avatar

    My Insightful Observation:

    The critique of anthropomorphism in our understanding of the divine is thought-provoking. By attributing human-like qualities or expectations to God, we risk limiting the infinite and eternal nature of the Creator. Recognizing and transcending these limitations can lead to a more nuanced and profound understanding of spirituality. The reference to “God Is Not Superman” aptly highlights the distinction between human conceptions of power and the divine nature.

  8. mayokun1964 Avatar

    Reflective Connection

    This topic thoughtfully connects earlier discussions on the mindset needed to approach spiritual understanding and the limitations of human comprehension. Recognizing that we can’t fully grasp God’s nature is a humbling reminder of the complexity and depth of spirituality. By acknowledging these limitations, we can cultivate a more nuanced and reverent approach to faith and understanding.

  9. mayokun1964 Avatar

    Understand Fundamental Insight

    You’re highlighting a crucial point: God, as a divine entity, transcends human traits and limitations. Anthropomorphism can indeed lead to misconceptions by attributing human-like qualities to God. Recognizing this distinction is essential for a more accurate and respectful understanding of the divine.

  10. mayokun1964 Avatar

    Anthropomorphism a Powerful Statement

    Anthropomorphism can indeed be problematic when applied to the divine, as it risks reducing the infinite and mysterious nature of God to human-like limitations and characteristics. By acknowledging this danger, we can strive for a more nuanced and reverent understanding of the divine, one that honors its transcendent and mysterious nature.

  11. […] search from the desire for self improvement and spiritual knowledge we block the gate (ref. “God Is Neither Superman, Nor Santa“, “Praise and Worship: Much Ado About […]

  12. […] misinterpretations arise from habits of anthropomorphism (ref. “God Is Neither Superman Nor Santa“), wherein we separate the Personality of Christ, The Word, and Divine Truth.  This is wrong […]

  13. […] “God Is Neither Superman Nor Santa” we investigated anthropomorphism, which makes it difficult to interpret The Word, […]

  14. […] of these reasons make sense, as explained in previous essays like “God Is Neither Superman Nor Santa“, and “God ‘Wants’ […]

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Word, (Re)Discovered

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading